This one happened on April 10, 2008, at the Midland Police Department shooting range and was first addressed on these pages in Who Shot J.R.
An open records request provided the facts surrounding this mishap. But first, here's a question. Should the details about a police officer accidentally firing his weapon and injuring another police officer be public information?
The city delivers email news releases to anyone who wishes to susbscribe, and it's a good way to keep up with city government news. However, there was no email news alert about this accident. I learned about it from a report on CBS 7 and sent a query to through their contact page asking how they learned about it. But they didn't respond. A tv news department has to shield its sources from those bothersome bloggers, I suppose.
Fortunately, the state of Texas has an Open Records Act requiring government bodies to disclose information in their possession provided the information doesn't fall within one of the several exceptions. So I hand delivered an Open Records Request to the city information officer.
The city circled the wagons and appealed the request to the Texas Attorney General on the basis that it would be too embarrassing to let the public see it. And even after the AG declared that the public had the right to this information the city still dragged its feet, and it was over a month after the AG ruling until the information finally arrived at my P.O. box.
I wasn't really sure what to do with it once I received it. It was just another Glock accidental discharge, but at least with this one there was a lot of detail about how it happened. The AG said the people have a right to know, and given the way the city reacted, then maybe this really should be given public exposure. And given that the shooter holds himself out to be an educator he will surely appreciate the educational benefit this provides and agree that the opportunity to educate the public on gun safety will override any of his personal concerns.
It happened on April 10, 2008, as Sgt. William Dale Seago was about to clean his .40 caliber Glock 22 in the gun cleaning room at the Midland Police Department Shooting Range. He was taking the gun apart in order to clean it, but there was a bullet in the chamber -- a big rule violation. He pulled the trigger sending a bullet into the legs of another police officer.
Check out the Case Report PDF. It's fascinating reading for those interesting in that sort of thing.
Unintentional Glock discharges seem to fall in two categories. First, the handgun has a light trigger pull and no manual safety. So many of the accidents involving this particular handgun happen when someone pulls the trigger when they didn't want to. The second is during the break-down procedure for cleaning. For some reason the Glock was designed so that the trigger has to be pulled in order to remove the slide. If there's a bullet in the chamber, then BLAM! The owners' manual advises against that, of course.
There may be others, but the Glock and the Springfield XD are two handguns that require the trigger pull in the disassembly process. When I first started writing about handgun mishaps I was ready to pin the blame on a design flaw. But comment after comment left on these pages have drilled home the concept that the flaw is between the ears of the people who fire off these things by accident. It's tempting to chide Sgt. Seago about this, but instead let's just take it from an expert at PoliceOne.com:
Of course, I’ve left out the most common cause of a Negligent Discharge, the ever popular “while cleaning the gun,” excuse. This is a rule #1 stupidity issue, pure and simple. You must clear the thing fully and carefully before pulling the trigger or attempting disassembly for cleaning. An aggravating factor here is the need to pull the trigger before disassembly with some brands of pistol.
Finally, something about open records. Search engine queries about open records frequently land on these posts, so for anyone interested in the process, Correspondence PDF
consists of the letters involved with this one, including the AG's ruling.