The other day a front page article in the local morning newspaper screamed that Texas children are on track to be poor, underemployed and subject to high healthcare costs. That last one, high healthcare costs, is a given no matter what else happens. But let's not get bogged down with details just yet.
The article is a retelling of a press release found here from an advocacy group called Texans Care for Children.
Let's just take one line from both the article and the press release: Here's the line from the newspaper article
Texas also ranks the highest for fatalities that result from child abuse or neglect ...
And here's the line from the press release:
The state also has the most fatalities from child abuse or neglect among states ...
Can this be fact checked? The press release leads us to the full report which says this:
In the last decade, more children in Texas than in any other state have died as a result of abuse or neglect.1
The footnote leads to this:
To access detailed source information for this section, visit txchildren.org/Report/Protection.
That's where we find this:
Sources in Child Protection
1 Every Child Matters Fund. "We Can Do Better: Child Abuse and Neglect Deaths in the U.S." (Washington D.C., 2009), http://www.everychildmatters.org/images/stories/pdf/wcdb_report.pdf
The above URL is a 404 dead end. But a search at everychildmatters.org, another advocacy group, leads us to a later report titled: SECOND EDITION We Can Do Better Child Abuse and Neglect Deaths in America. And there we find a couple of charts, one of which might seem to bear out the claim. But only two years are displayed, 2001 and 2008, with no explanation why only those two. And the number of child abuse and neglect deaths attributed to Texas is so high, 223 in the year 2008 versus 185 in California and 107 in New York that there has to have been some statistical fluke -- a higher population of children, a different reporting standard, or simply gaming the numbers.
In any event, the phrase, "more children in Texas than in any other state have died as a result of abuse or neglect" is meaningless unless the objective is simply to instill a feeling of guilt.
This journey so far has been too tiresome to continue on to footnote #2, so I'm quitting. What should we make of all of this? If you are in favor of something an advocacy group is promoting, then accept their press releases as truth. If you are against it, then you probably don't have to search very long to find out they've stretched the truth to make their case. A press release from an advocacy group should be given the same respect as a TV commercial.
Finally, I don't want to sound as if I'm criticizing the local reporter, after all, she once received this blog's recognition as hardest working local newspaper reporter, and we know she can do her stuff. So we can't really blame her for taking a break from day-to-day reporting every once in a while and relying on advocacy group press releases. Heck, I may want to issue my own press release someday -- "Sleepless in Midland completed another year of blogging -- there were no survivors."