« Democracy, majorities, and freedom | Main | Dallas Police and Fire pension system's luxury investments »

September 18, 2012


" ... The interview seemed to slant toward the warmist side ..."

Oh, just a teensy bit. I mentioned that problem back in July, "PBS NewsHour global warming coverage: IPCC/NOAA Scientists - 18; Skeptic Scientists - 0" http://junkscience.com/2012/07/13/pbs-newshour-global-warming-coverage-ipccnoaa-scientists-18-skeptic-scientists-0/ and then expanded on the problem when I described a survey the NewsHour was conduction about their climate change reporting: http://junkscience.com/2012/08/17/pbs-newshour-please-fill-out-a-survey-about-our-science-and-climate-change-coverage/

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)